The agentic solution to CFO and ERP modernization
Connect and migrate any enterprise system from a prompt.
Describe the work in plain English. NAP reads the systems, builds the connector, proves the numbers balance, and runs it. Migration, implementation blueprinting, connector orchestration and runtime workflow management all run as software.
What actually changes
Seven things move. Only one of them is the data.
On-premise today
Perpetual licence, running on your hardware
Customizations written into the base application
Reports and integrations reading the database directly
Upgrades as projects, every few years
A server your integrations point at
Backups, patching and DR you own
An IT dependency for every change
On-premise today
Perpetual licence, running on your hardware
Customizations written into the base application
Reports and integrations reading the database directly
Upgrades as projects, every few years
A server your integrations point at
Backups, patching and DR you own
An IT dependency for every change
The two paths
Microsoft publishes a programme. Sage runs a deadline.
Both vendors want their on-premise base in the cloud. They are going about it in completely different ways, and the argument that moves a customer is different in each.
Microsoft · on-premise to Business Central
The cost objection is already answered
GP, NAV, SL and BC on-premise
Discount across a three-year term
40%
User licences on eligible Business Central migrations
$0
Additional on-premise licences during transition
50% off
Lapsed enhancement plans on older releases
eligible
Enhancement plan backpay
capped at 1 year
Running both systems during cutover
dual access
None of this is revenue to a partner or to us. It is the reason a customer stops saying not this year. We build the migration so the customer qualifies rather than around it.
Sage · on-premise to Sage Intacct
The deadline is the hardware
Sage 100, 200 and 300
Published migration promotion
none
Existing-relationship incentives
partner negotiated
Access to legacy data after signing
retained
Cost of migrating versus upgrading
often lower
The forcing event most people miss
Windows 10 support ended in October 2025, and recent Sage 100 releases expect Windows 11. An ageing server means a new operating system and new workstations, and that spend lands in the same year as the migration decision. For many customers, moving to Intacct costs less than staying and upgrading everything underneath.
There is no headline Sage promotion to quote. Incentives are negotiated through the partner relationship, which is one more reason the Sage partner should stay in front of the customer and NAP should stay underneath.
How NAP runs it
Four steps, and a cutover declared against a balance.
Step 01
Read the estate
Both the data model and the connector estate. Not scoped by interview, read directly from the systems.
Step 02
Model the target
Segments resolved to dimensions from posted history. Customizations classified: extension, native, or obsolete.
Step 03
Rebuild what touched the server
Every report and integration reading the database directly gets an API path. Direct writes lose the back door.
Step 04
Sage 100, 200 and 300
Each entity clears its own trial-balance gate. The group close waits for the last one.
The part nobody scopes
Every integration pointed at the old server breaks on cutover.
Most finance teams have no list of what those integrations are. On a recent engagement NAP found forty-one. Seventeen were on nobody's list, including a spreadsheet writing directly into the database and a nightly bank file nobody had documented.